android - Skip test tasks for specific build types -


i have 4 different build types:

  • release
  • dev
  • mock
  • test

when want make clean build task project see gradle making clean build unit tests.

it ok unit tests running every build type, takes 4 times longer clean build.

how can make clean build unit tests release build type?

there no nice task that. have write yourself.

try add next build.gradle:

project.afterevaluate {   // grab build types , product flavors   def buildtypes = android.buildtypes.collect { type -> type.name }   def productflavors = android.productflavors.collect { flavor -> flavor.name }    // when no product flavors defined, use empty   if (!productflavors) {     productflavors.add('')   }    productflavors.each { productflavorname ->     buildtypes.each { buildtypename ->       def sourcename       if (!productflavorname) {         sourcename = "${buildtypename}"       } else {         sourcename = "${productflavorname}${buildtypename.capitalize()}"       }       def testtaskname = "test${sourcename.capitalize()}unittest"       def assembletaskname = "assemble${sourcename.capitalize()}"       task "build${sourcename.capitalize()}"(dependson: ["$testtaskname", "$assembletaskname"])     }   }    task 'buildrelease'(dependson: tasks.findall { t -> t.name.startswith('build') && t.name != 'build' && t.name != 'buildneeded' }) }

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more