Using Asp.NET Identity with custom user manager/database -


i use parts of identity system of asp.net access custom database, not of parts. database portion wasn't difficult, trying find out how write code put work of identity methods custom implementation. example 1 of differing items not use usermanager password hash, instead use other 3rd party password hash function. of things i'd take advantage of cookie authentication, password validator fields, etc. so, first thing tried @ standard createasync method does, , takes me blank line looking this:

[asyncstatemachine(typeof(usermanager<>.<createasync>d__73))] public virtual task<identityresult> createasync(tuser user, string password);

how can make custom create-async , password-verification functions? oh, 'custom database' mean, not want use tables come identity, no roles, claims, own users table all.

i did there's code post here answer unfortunately.

for createasync need make custom userstore class implements `iuserstore<your custom user>, iuserpasswordstore<your custom user>`  need implement createasync method:  async task<identityresult> iuserstore<your custom user>.createasync(your custom user user, cancellationtoken cancellationtoken)         {              identityresult result;             var tsk = task.factory.startnew(() => result = somedataaccessclass.somesaveusertodatabasefunction(user));              return await tsk;         }

you can implement data class , save user function want @ point.

the password verification little more complex depending on do.

you'll have create custom signinmanager inherits the regular signinmanager. override passwordsigninasync method whatever you're doing security-wise. note you'll need implement of other functions on usermanager find user async , stuff that.

also note identity pipeline fill in missing pieces need services.addidentity().adduserstore().addsigninmanger (and other classes customize) in startup.cs configureservices() method , throw app.useidentity() configure method too.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more