c# - NUnit 3.7.1: Assert.Inconclusive with InnerException -


i have onetimesetup want verify integration connections prior running tests (databases, rest endpoints, etc.), short-circuiting suite if there issue. consider like

try     dim testcontext dbcontext = new dbcontext(_configuredconnectionstring)      verifysqlconnection(testcontext) catch ex exception     dim actionableerror string = string.format(_verify_sql_connection_template, _configuredconnectionstring)     dim actionableexception new configurationexception(actionableerror, ex)     'throw actionableexception      assert.inconclusive(actionableerror) end try

if connection fails, don't want fail test, want assert entire suite inconclusive, because actual test never ran.

i'm noticing assert.inconclusive lacks overload taking in inner exception. forces me either fail tests, full inner exception inspect, or mark tests inconclusive, lose actionable information nunit test runner window.

  • is there reason or overload missing oversight?
  • is there alternative use both inconclusive and full inner exception (not message, stack, etc.)?

nunit's inconclusive result intended mean test cannot run because pre-condition has not been met. fact exception happens thrown part of internal implementation - it's how force test stop running @ point - nothing nature of exception exposed user.

assert.inconclusive manual way provide such inconclusive result. absolutely, without making particular test, in similar way how assert.fail works. if want make test of kind, "assumed" use assume.that method produce result.

in case, verifysqlconnection method sounds should testing in @ least 1 test method, failing if can't make it. other tests depend on connection having been made, use code similar to...

assume.that(() => verifysqlconnection(testcontext), throws.nothing);

the above c# syntax... leave vb translation you. :-)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more