javascript - VueJS extend component: remove parent's property -


i have 2 vue components, 1 extends other:

// compa.vue  export default {     props: {         value1: object,     },      data: function () {         return {             value2: 'hello2 a',             value3: 'hello3 a'         }     } }  // compb.vue  import compa './compa.vue';  export default {     extends: compa,      props: {         value4: object     },      data: function(){         return {             value2: 'hello2 b'         }     } }

as described in docs, compb's options merged compa's, resulting:

{     props: {         value1: object,         value4: object     },      data: function () {         return {             value2: 'hello2 b',             value3: 'hello3 a'         }     } }

however desired result having property value1 removed:

{     props: {         value4: object     },      data: function () {         return {             value2: 'hello2 b',             value3: 'hello3 a'         }     } }

i think should possible using custom option merge strategies

but if return null or undefined, property isn't removed.

vue.config.optionmergestrategies.data = function(parentval, childval) {     return null; };

is possible such thing? if yes, how?

it's not quite clear me how vue.config.optionmergestrategies works work in test environment.

import compa './compa.vue'; // make deep clone copy of compa. here i'm using made copy // function use lodash or other library. not use // json.parse(json.stringify(...)) because lose functions. // object.assign not work because object.assign performs shallow // copy (meaning if delete props, nested object, // still globally delete property). import copy "./utils"  //copy compa let newcompa = copy(compa)     // delete desired props delete newcompa.props.value1  export default {     // extend copy     extends: newcompa,      props: {         value4: object     },      data: function(){         return {             value2: 'hello2 b'         }     } }

essentially, delete props not want before extend component.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more