javascript - Reposition React child to cover parent -


with lot of recursively nested children like

const data = [    {      "id": 1,      "children": [        { "id": 2 },        {          "id": 3,          "children": [            { "id": 4 },            {              "id": 5,              "children": [                { "id": 6 }              ]            }          ]        }      ]    }  ]    const node = props => {    return (      <div style={{ 'display': 'grid', 'gridtemplatecolumns': '1em auto 1em' }}>        <span style={{ 'background': 'red' }}/>          { props.data.children ?          <div style={{ 'background': 'green' }}>            <div>{props.data.id}</div>            {props.data.children.map(n => <node key={n.id} data={n} />)}          </div>        :        <div>{props.data.id}</div>        }        <span style={{ 'background': 'blue' }}/>      </div>    )  }    const app = props => {    return (      <div>        {props.data.map(n => <node key={n.id} data={n} />)}      </div>    )  }    reactdom.render(<app data={data} />, document.getelementbyid('root'));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>  <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>    <div id="root"></div>

how can of these nodes (re)positioned have parent (same) x position? i.e. child covers parent , there's no visible nesting/indenting/containment, , red, blue , green backgrounds columns.

i think i'd prefer nested solution on stuff tethering, appending, teleporting, context-shifting other dom elements , on.

(here's same example on stackblitz.)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more