javascript - How can I implement tic tac toe win condition with my current setup? -


i working on tic tac toe multiplayer game built in node.js.

my main issue figuring out how check win condition. know how works using array want program game way....

var mongoose = require('mongoose');  var gameschema = new mongoose.schema({      player1: {         type: mongoose.schema.types.objectid,         ref: "user"     },      player2: {         type: mongoose.schema.types.objectid,         ref: "user"     },      // array of selected spaces 'x' or 'o'     placements: [{         type: mongoose.schema.types.objectid,         ref: "placement"     }],      // username of current player.     currentplayer: string });  module.export = mongoose.model('game', gameschema);

placement schema:

var mongoose = require('mongoose');  var placementschema = new mongoose.schema({     marker: string, //x or o      selectedspace: number // 0-8 });  module.export = mongoose.model('placement', placementschema);

i want use placements array of model objects....

what best way check win condition way?

or should rethink way model setup?

if understand setup correctly, whenever add placement, need check if there winner or not.

// req.params.game = id of board game // req.body = { marker: 'x' or 'o', selectedspace: 0 8 }  app.post('/game/:game/placement', (req, res, next) => {     // find board game     game.findbyid(req.params.game, (err, game) => {         if (err) return next(err);          // create placement (!)         placement.create(req.body, (err, placement) => {             if (err) return next(err);              // add placement game             game.placements.push(placement._id);              // might want swap game.currentplayer @ point too; i'll leave              game.save(err => {                 if (err) return next(err);                  // placements b/c we'll need check of them                 game.populate('placements').execpopulate().then(() => {                     let winner = game.getwinner();                       if (winner) {                         // send response declare winner , stop game                     } else {                         // send response nothing                     }                 });             });         });     }); });

in schema, have

// add logic check if there winner or not;  // winner has 0 1 2 (horizontal 1st row), 3 4 5 (horizontal 2nd row), 6 7 8 (horizontal 3rd row), // 0 3 6 (vertical 1st column), 1 4 7 (vertical 2nd column), 2 5 8 (vertical 3rd column), 0 4 8 (diagonal), 2 4 6 (diagonal);  // has not been tested should give pointers @ least; // there might simpler logic gameschema.methods.getwinner = function () {     let strikes = [[0,1,2], [3,4,5], [6,7,8], [0,3,6], [1,4,7], [2,5,8], [0,4,8], [2,4,6]];     let dict = {         x: [],         o: []     };     // group placements marker (!)     let winningplacement = this.placements.find(placement => {         dict[placement.marker].push(placement.selectedspace);         // check if of strikes contained in marker's list of selected spaces         return strikes.some(strike => issuper(dict[placement.marker], strike));     });     // assuming player1 'x'     if (winningplacement) {         return winningplacement.marker == 'x' ? this.player1 : this.player2;     }     return false; };

outside scope of question, see answer issuper() logic.

imo though think should rethink design. example, using array of references bit unneccessary. save doing (!) there's no way distinguish between player x or o (unless assume player1 starts first x).


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more