reactjs - Login with Google, using a Ruby on Rails API and React -


i'm current trying implement login google option make easier user login , create user.

i have rails api uses devise login, , front using react makes requests rails 5 api.

im not sure if have login on end or @ front end, greatest problem create user when login google, because cannot create user without password.

i never created kinda of login system i'm not sure how works, believe have implement in end, using google oauth gem, wanna know if has tips how it.

should use react components only? rails gems only? or both correct answer?

thank you.

i give direction archive this.

first thing, have figure out grant flow going use in oauth provider.

there 4 ways it, list common 2 ways.

  1. code grant flow (used in website omniauth-google or similar gem use way)

  2. implicit grant flow (native app, means have oauth flow in front-end)

if going implement api server, should consider second way.

because api server should stateless, first way need session save state of oauth flow.

besides, devise not idea implement api server, should consider jwt or token-like authentication.

although, enable session store within rails api use devise or omniauth-series.

if want oauth in front-end, go second way.

or add button link oauth callback url in react component, web server deal oauth flow(this first way).

after considering situation, suggest use first way.

because there many resource devise , omniauth-series find on internet.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more