SQL Update 2 Columns from 1 Case -


i have code selects price based on logic. our choices target margin, average historical price, , market price (and these have been calculated). sometimes, want ignore logic , explicitly "for model, please use price, instead of might've picked". hold price used. sets price no problem:

update set [price] = case     when [logic override] = 1 [target margin price]     when [logic override] = 2 [average historical price]     when [logic override] = 3 [market price]     else [price]     end pricetable ([logic override] <> 4 , [logic override] not null) , [model_id] = coalesce(nullif(@modelid, ''), [model_id])

what want able set [pricing method]. must create whole new case statement when want set both price , pricing method to, say, $20 , 'target margin', respectively, if logic override 1? can't seem right syntax this.

you can create multiple sql logic in columns (as long trying update same table).

your desired results confusing , not sure need hope helps idea of updating multiple columns each different clauses. think trying ask.

 update  set [price] = (select case                     when [logic override] = 1 [target margin price]                     when [logic override] = 2 [average historical price]                     when [logic override] = 3 [market price]                     else [price]                    end                    pricetable                     ([logic override] <> 4 , [logic override] not null)                     , [model_id] = coalesce(nullif(@modelid, ''), [model_id]),        [pricing method] = (select '$20' [pricing method] pricetable [logic        override] = 1),        [price] =  (select '$20' [price] pricetable [logic override] = 1),       [target margin]  = (select '$20' [target margin] pricetable [logic override] = 1)  pricetable

i don't recommend these types of updates because hard maintain (if there multiple logic, tables, etc. needs updated, cumbersome). recommend create update each column easier maintain, read , understood peers. each own.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more